top of page

China's Production Juggernaut: How Excess Capacity Shapes Global Markets

(Staff Analyst: Jacob Allsup) China's relentless ambition to dominate global manufacturing has resulted in massive overcapacity across various industries, from semiconductors to steel. This overproduction is reshaping international markets, sparking geopolitical tensions, and creating economic volatility worldwide. The motivations behind this push are deeply intertwined with China's strategic objectives, government policies, and the dynamics of global trade, affecting economies and industries globally.

Semiconductor Overcapacity and Global Implications

In a world where control over semiconductors equates to geopolitical power, the strategic maneuvering of the U.S. and China is profoundly reshaping global dynamics. China's push to dominate the semiconductor industry, characterized by an aggressive expansion that includes $1.8 billion in subsidies and plans for 18 new fabrication facilities, signals a brewing storm over technological supremacy. This expansion not only threatens to destabilize the global semiconductor market by potentially allowing China to manipulate supply chains during times of geopolitical tensions but also poses the risk of undercutting global chip prices, thus harming the profitability of semiconductor industries in other countries. Such tactics mirror historical strategies where nations used industries like steel and solar panels as tools in geopolitical games.

Recognizing the critical role of semiconductors in both economic and military arenas, the United States has initiated a significant shift toward on-shoring semiconductor production. This strategic pivot is anchored by the CHIPS and Science Act, which infuses over $52 billion into reviving and expanding American semiconductor manufacturing. This move is crucial not only for bolstering the domestic economy but also for securing the military's access to vital technologies used in advanced weapons systems like the F-35 fighter jet, ensuring that the U.S. maintains its technological edge in an increasingly competitive world.

The strategic divergence of the United States and China in developing separate semiconductor supply chains carries profound implications for the global economic and security landscape. As both superpowers strive for technological self-sufficiency, the creation of distinct supply ecosystems could lead to a fragmentation of global tech standards, potentially resulting in a bifurcated tech world. This "derisking" might accelerate competition for influence over third-party nations' technological infrastructures and standards, impacting international trade and geopolitical alliances. Moreover, the economic implications are significant, as companies worldwide may face increased costs and complexity, needing to adapt to two sets of technology systems and regulations. This split could dampen global innovation by limiting the collaboration that has historically driven technological advancements, potentially leading to slower growth and increased barriers to entry in key markets. Strategic derisking in semiconductors is a bellwether for broader economic and military strategies between these two powers, signaling a shift towards greater insularity and competition in the global arena.

Green Tech Oversupply and Trade Tensions

China's extensive manufacturing capabilities in green technologies like electric vehicles (EVs), solar panels, and lithium batteries have created significant overcapacity, influencing global green goods trade. This overproduction is shifting from China's domestic market to international markets, potentially exacerbating tensions in the global trading system as countries like the United States and the European Union seek to protect their own emerging industries.

For electric vehicles, China's approach has led to a substantial increase in production and export. While some sectors like EVs have shown high utilization rates due to efficient production and competitive pricing, others like lithium batteries and solar panels have not, reflecting disparities in capacity utilization across different sectors. The impact of this overproduction extends beyond economics into geopolitical realms, as evidenced by the EU's anti-dumping investigations into Chinese EVs amidst concerns that cheap imports are undermining local producers.

The surge in production of solar panels in China, fueled by substantial subsidies, has led to an oversupply on the global market, driving down prices significantly. This glut poses considerable challenges for manufacturers in other countries, who struggle to compete against the wave of inexpensive Chinese panels. This competitive pressure could hinder the broader global shift toward renewable energy, as it may discourage investment in local production and innovation in the renewable sector.

These developments suggest a complex interplay between China's industrial policy and global green goods markets, where the pursuit of economic growth through manufacturing overcapacity meets the strategic imperatives of national security and economic independence in other nations. The push from countries to develop their own green technologies may lead to more fragmented global markets, potentially leading to a scenario where global cooperation on climate goals becomes more challenging.

Overcapacity in Traditional Manufacturing

Beyond high-tech sectors, China's overcapacity extends to traditional manufacturing like steel and aluminum. Since the early 2000s, driven by substantial government subsidies and favorable policies, China's aluminum production has surged tenfold. It now accounts for 59% of the global market. This dominance has not only led to price volatility but has also pushed many global competitors to the brink, as they struggle to compete with the low prices driven by China's overproduction.

The implications of this dominance are profound and multifaceted. For example, the aluminum industry's by-product, gallium, which is crucial for electronics and solar cells, has experienced severe price fluctuations. This volatility has had a detrimental impact on producers in countries like the UK and Germany, distorting markets and supply chains globally. In the steel sector, the situation is similarly grim, with Chinese overcapacity flooding the market and driving down prices to levels that many international producers find unsustainable. This has led to a clamor for trade protections and tariffs, as nations strive to shield their domestic industries from the devastating effects of such market distortions.

Strategic Responses to China's Manufacturing Overcapacity

As China's manufacturing overcapacity continues to challenge global markets, strategic responses from the United States and the European Union have become increasingly pivotal. These measures are designed not only to safeguard domestic industries but also to secure broader economic and national security interests amid rising technological competition.

As previously mentioned, the U.S. has spearheaded efforts with the CHIPS and Science Act, channeling over $52 billion into semiconductor manufacturing to decrease reliance on Chinese imports. This act is part of a larger strategy that includes tightening export controls on critical technologies, ensuring these technologies do not enhance China's strategic capabilities at America's expense.

Similarly, the European Union has implemented its own set of strategies, such as the European Chips Act, which mirrors American efforts but is tailored to the unique market dynamics and regulatory frameworks of the EU. Additionally, the EU has adjusted its trade policies to include anti-dumping duties and stricter import controls on products like steel and solar panels, directly addressing the distortions caused by Chinese overproduction.

Beyond individual national measures, there is a growing trend towards global coordination. Countries like Japan and South Korea have developed national strategies to enhance their semiconductor capacities, signaling a collective move towards technological sovereignty. These strategies often include significant subsidies and partnerships with industry leaders to foster innovation and secure supply chains.

The strategic recalibration towards greater technological independence marks a critical juncture in global economic policy. As nations strive to balance competition with cooperation, the landscape of international trade and technology is being reshaped. The evolving policy responses not only reflect a defensive posture against overcapacity but also a proactive effort to foster domestic innovation.

Backfiring Consequences for China

China’s aggressive pursuit of manufacturing supremacy, once seen as an infallible strategy for global dominance, is showing signs of faltering. The once unassailable giant, celebrated for its industrial prowess, encountered an unexpected downturn in March 2024. After a robust start to the year, production growth sharply decelerated, increasing by only 4.5%—a significant drop from the higher rates of January and February. This abrupt slowdown exposes the vulnerabilities of China’s expansive industrial strategy and hints at deeper systemic issues that could undermine its ambitious economic goals​.

The data is beginning to indicate a troubling trend of declining utilization rates in key manufacturing sectors, dipping to their lowest levels since 2015, excluding the pandemic-impacted periods. This decline indicates a substantial amount of underused capacity, which not only underscores inefficiencies but also highlights the financial strain on many state-owned enterprises​. These enterprises are grappling with increasing debts and are less profitable, reflecting the broader issue of excess capacity that is not compensated by domestic consumption or international demand​.

Moreover, specific sectors like automobile manufacturing and electrical equipment, which are vital for China's new economic directives, are particularly affected. The utilization rates in these sectors have fallen dramatically, with some areas like automobile manufacturing experiencing utilization rates well below historical averages​​. This underutilization is forcing a reconsideration of investment strategies within these sectors, potentially leading to reduced investment if demand does not improve.

These challenges pose a significant risk to China's economic stability and highlight the vulnerabilities of a strategy heavily reliant on overproduction. The ongoing situation could force a strategic pivot or recalibration of policies to address the inefficiencies and financial burdens created by this overcapacity.


China's strategy of aggressive industrial expansion aimed at global manufacturing dominance has reached a critical inflection point, revealing systemic vulnerabilities that threaten its own economic stability. As the repercussions of China's overcapacity unfold, their impact stretches far beyond a simple surplus of products. Instead, they are significantly altering the geopolitical and economic contours across the globe. 

Looking ahead, China faces a complex challenge: recalibrating its industrial policies to mitigate the internal inefficiencies while navigating the growing pushback from global powers investing heavily in technological sovereignty. The U.S. and EU, through acts like the CHIPS and Science Act and the European Chips Act, are fortifying their technological and industrial bases to counteract China’s expansive tactics. This global strategic pivot towards greater technological independence and economic security is likely to redefine international trade and cooperation frameworks, emphasizing a more localized and secure supply chain management approach.

As the world grapples with these shifts, the overarching narrative of China’s economic maneuvers offers a cautionary tale about the balance between rapid industrialization and sustainable growth. The international community's response will not only shape the future of global trade relations but also determine the trajectory of technological innovation and economic integration in an increasingly multipolar world. This dynamic interplay between national ambitions and global realities underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of economic policy as a tool of both development and diplomacy.

68 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page